Family policy, especially under the heading of "reconciling family and career," is an ongoing social issue. In particular, the problematic aspects of reconciling family and work are at the center of the debate. How can the conflicts surrounding the areas of tension between gainful employment, care, time and money be resolved constructively for families without economizing families and without traditionalizing families?
Our proposal, which we have elaborated in numerous trialogues (started in 2009 at the Humboldt-Viadrina School of Governance), introduces the concept of partnership for this purpose, which is applied in the personal as well as in the social and political sphere. Our goal is always to combine difference and equality in order to promote individual dignity and independence as well as productive voluntary cooperation. At the same time, family is a "public good" and at least as important as education, health, transportation and infrastructure. The principles according to which individual families are ordered or structured are shaped by society and, conversely, continue to have an effect on it.
Context of the trialogue
The implications and perspectives of the First Report on Gender Equality, in particular its multifaceted and open mission statement, are to be communicated to the public in a positive and emotionally appealing way. Against this backdrop, a trialogue on the topic of "Public communication on the topic of equality" was held on November 21, 2014 in cooperation with the Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth.
Aim of the Trialogue
In a protected atmosphere and discursive openness, the following questions and topics in particular were discussed:
Structure of the Trialog
The event opened with an introductory lecture by Prof. Dr. Gesine Schwan and an introductory discussion (discussions according to Chatham House Rule). Subsequently, three stakeholders gave 20-minute input presentations on their positions, experiences and own perceptions on the topic of equality and the communication of the topic. The impulses from these presentations served as the basis for the subsequent joint discussion.
In the afternoon, the participants initially divided into two workshops. In the workshops, key points for the further communication of the findings of the equality report were elaborated. When dividing up the participants, it was ensured that representatives of politics, the corporate sector and organized civil society were represented in each of the two working groups.
In the second part of the afternoon, both working groups came together again with their results from the workshops and formulated - as far as possible - common key points. Remaining differences were marked.
Context of the trialogue
Against the backdrop of the ongoing public debate on new approaches to working time policy and the issue of reconciling family and career in a spirit of partnership, we organized a trialogue on March 20, 2015 in cooperation with the German Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth on the topic of "What kind of work (time) culture do we need?"
Aim of the Trialogue
In a protected atmosphere and discursive openness, the following questions and topics in particular were discussed:
Structure of the Trialog
The event started with an introductory talk by Prof. Dr. Gesine Schwan and an introductory discussion (discussions according to Chatham House Rule). This was followed by two 20-minute input presentations in which stakeholders brought up their (different) positions and experiences for the subsequent joint discussion. In the afternoon, necessary steps for establishing a new work (time) culture were recorded in workshops.